| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.

View
 

Branches of Oratory

Page history last edited by K. Gonzales 10 years, 6 months ago

K. Gonzales

 

Branches of Oratory

 

 

Background  

 

Aristotle's Rhetoric (Ars Rhetorica) concerns itself with the art of persuasion, and includes the enormity of rhetorical concepts currently studied in classical rhetoric and “informs us about the cognitive features of language and style.”1 The work is dived into three books, the first primarily about rhetoric as a general concept, and provides a definition of rhetoric as an art. It discusses the “centrality of proofs and enthymemes”2 including, beginning at 1.3.1, our topic of the three branches of oratory – deliberative, forensic, and epideictic. Book II speaks to the three means of persuasion (ethos, logos, and pathos) and Book III discusses elements of style and arrangement.

 

Overview

 

Rhetoric falls into three divisions, determined by the three classes of listeners to speeches. For of the three elements in speech-making -- speaker, subject, and person addressed -- it is the last one, the hearer, that determines the speech's end and object. The hearer must be either a judge, with a decision to make about things past or future, or an observer. A member of the assembly decides about future events, a juryman about past events: while those who merely decide on the orator's skill are observers. From this it follows that there are three divisions of oratory - (1) political, (2) forensic, and (3) the ceremonial oratory of display.” 3 Additionally, the divisions of oratory are further divided into “topics of invention” which further divide the topic into specific considerations.
 

 

*note : the following discussion of oratory will be categorized by past, present, and future forms.
 
 
 

Judicial Oratory/Forensic (past)

 

“Forensic speaking either attacks or defends somebody: one or other of these two things must always be done by the parties in a case'.4 Forensic oratory is concerned with the past, and speaks to events that have already come to pass and are now being discussed in a court of law. The principles of justice/injustice are paramount to the judicial oratory, though it should be understood that the definitions and discussions of what is “just” and “unjust” are complex, and are discussed widely through the Rhetoric.

 

Justice

 
 “Justice is reason without passion, and so justice includes, though not exhausted by, the
intelligent application of rules.”5

 

Injustice

 

“Injustice is defined, at the opening of Chapter 10, as voluntarily causing injury contrary to
the law.”6

 

 

Deliberative Oratory/Political (present)

 
“...urges us either to do or not to do something: one of these two courses is always taken by private counsellors, as well as by men who address public assemblies.7 The political orator is concerned with the future: it is about things to be done hereafter that he advises, for or against.” 8 Political oratory is primarily concerned with the topics of invention, goodness/unworthiness and advantageousness/disadvantageousness. Essentially, political speaking aims to persuade an audience to do, or not to do something. Its end goal is to influence a populous about actions to be taken in the future.

 

  Goodness/Advantageousness 

 

 
 

Unworthiness/Disadvantageousness

 

 

 

 

 

“A type of suasive speech designed primarily for rhetorical effect. Epideictic oratory was panegyrical, declamatory, and demonstrative. Its aim was to condemn or to eulogize an individual, cause, occasion, movement, city, or state.”9 This type of oratory is largely ceremonial and “either praises or censures somebody”.10 The ceremonial orator is, properly speaking, concerned with the present, since all men praise or blame in view of the state of things existing at the time, though they often find it useful also to recall the past and to make guesses at the future.11

 

  Honor

 

“The standard form of the epidiactic oration is the encomium. As explained by Aristotle and his successors, this form involves much more than simple flattery. It is in some respects closer to biography than oratory. The body of the encomium is devoted to a summary of the life of the man being praised.”12

 

 

     Disgrace

 
Although the standard form of epidiactic oration is based in praise, the expository vituperation is, conversely, a method of attacking a person's character for being evil, or vicious.

 

 

 

Further Reading

 

 

 

 


 

 

1Aristotle's Rhetoric – Stanford. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/

2Aristotle's Rhetoric Book One – Outline. http://www.wfu.edu/~zulick/300/aristotle1.html

3American Rhetoric – Aristotle's Rhetoeric – Selected Moments. http://www.americanrhetoric.com/aristotleonrhetoric.htm

4Book 1 – Chapter 3 : Aristotle's Rhetoric. http://www.public.iastate.edu/~honeyl/Rhetoric/rhet1-3.html

5Garver, Eugene. Aristotle's Rhetoric: an Art of Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. 67.

6“Aristotle's Rhetoric : An Art of Character.” 97. Garver, Eugene. Aristotle's Rhetoric: an Art of Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. 97.

7Aristotle, and W. Rhys Roberts. Rhetoric. Array New York: Modern Library, 1984. 9.

8Aristotle, and W. Rhys Roberts. Rhetoric. Array New York: Modern Library, 1984. 9.

10Book 1 – Chapter 3 : Aristotle's Rhetoric. http://www.public.iastate.edu/~honeyl/Rhetoric/rhet1-3.html

11Book 1 – Chapter 3 : Aristotle's Rhetoric. http://www.public.iastate.edu/~honeyl/Rhetoric/rhet1-3.html

12 Kallendorf, Craig. Landmark Essays On Rhetoric And Literature. Mahwah, N.J.: Hermagoras Press, 1999. 84. 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.